i'm not like you ● THE RECORD

Nazca / Peru "Alien Mummies" documented-hoax

2023-09-12 · presented to the Chamber of Deputies, Mexico City, Mexico; specimens originate from Nazca/Palpa, Peru · classification: disclosure, hoax (a fabrication presented at a legislative hearing)
On 12 September 2023 the Mexican ufologist Jaime Maussan presented two small, three-fingered, elongated-skull "non-human" bodies to a hearing of Mexico's Chamber of Deputies, testifying under oath that they were ~1,000-year-old beings "not part of our terrestrial evolution." Scientists rejected the claims immediately, and on 12 January 2024 forensic archaeologist Flavio Estrada of Peru's Institute of Legal Medicine declared the specimens dolls assembled from terrestrial animal and human bones with modern synthetic glue — a fraud, not a discovery.
The Nazca mummies are the corpus's reference fabrication and its sharpest study in institutional credulity. A hoax was presented under oath to a national legislature, given the procedural trappings of testimony, and lent apparent scientific cover by a Mexican Navy medical official — before forensic science resolved it. It is the apotheosis of Jaime Maussan's decades-long pattern (the 1991 eclipse, the 2015 Roswell slides, the 2017 first Nazca mummies), and it directly damaged the serious UAP conversation — the credible Navy witness Ryan Graves called it "a huge step backward... an unsubstantiated stunt." It is the case that marks where spectacle and evidence part ways.
Jaime Maussan, the Mexican journalist who presented the disputed 'non-human' bodies to the Chamber of Deputies on 12 September 2023.
Jaime Maussan, the Mexican journalist who presented the disputed 'non-human' bodies to the Chamber of Deputies on 12 September 2023. Wikipedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0
Session hall of the Mexican Chamber of Deputies (Cámara de Diputados), the venue of the 12 September 2023 UAP hearing.
Session hall of the Mexican Chamber of Deputies (Cámara de Diputados), the venue of the 12 September 2023 UAP hearing. Wikipedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

Timeline

2017-07
The bodies surface from the Nazca/Palpa region of Peru, reportedly via huaqueros (tomb robbers) looting genuine pre-Columbian graves. The largest specimen, "Maria," is promoted by Thierry Jamin's Inkari-Cusco institute and streamed by the U.S. company Gaia.com; Maussan leads a July 2017 reveal. Anthropologist Andrew Nelson and Peruvian researchers soon conclude the bodies are manipulated real human remains with a coating "added afterward to hide the manipulations." primary source: Live Science (16 Mar 2018); irna.fr
2021-10
Earlier Peruvian forensic work (reported by El Comercio / Infobae) finds the "skin" is adhesive, plant fiber, pulped paper and rubber; animal skulls have their snouts cut off; X-rays show bones artificially joined without proper anatomical articulation. primary source: El Comercio; Infobae (28 Oct 2021)
2023-09-12
Maussan displays two small bodies (grayish, ~1 m tall, three fingers per hand, elongated heads) in sealed cases before the Chamber of Deputies, in Mexico's first congressional UAP event; testimony is given under oath. Within two days UNAM distances itself and astronomers Antigona Segura and Julieta Fierro publicly dismiss it; Ryan Graves condemns it. witnesses: Jaime Maussan (presenter, under oath) · Jose de Jesus Zalce Benitez (Mexican Navy medical doctor, lent scientific cover) · Sergio Gutierrez Luna (Morena lawmaker who convened the hearing) primary source: Smithsonian (14 Sept 2023); BBC; Reuters via Inquirer
2023-10
Peruvian customs intercept doll-like figures (plus a separate three-fingered hand) in a box at DHL offices at Lima's airport, en route to a Mexican recipient. primary source: AP via Tucson.com; CBS News
2024-01-12
At the Lima archaeology museum, Flavio Estrada of the Institute of Legal Medicine / Public Prosecutor's office declares the figures "dolls assembled with bones of animals from this planet, with modern synthetic glues," and "a fraud" — "They are not extraterrestrials, they are not intraterrestrials, they are not a new species, they are not hybrids." Pharmaceutical chemist Ernesto Avalos performed the materials analysis. witnesses: Flavio Estrada (forensic archaeologist, Institute of Legal Medicine) primary source: CBS News; RPP; Global News (Jan 2024)
2024-2025
Peru's Nasca prosecutor pursues cultural-heritage crimes; the looter who supplied the remains is reportedly sentenced (~4 years' conditional imprisonment plus a fine), under appeal. No peer-reviewed evidence supports the non-human claim through June 2026; scientifically the case is closed, though Maussan continues to promote the bodies. primary source: lalupa.pe (updated Jan 2025); Skeptical Inquirer

Named personnel

  • Jaime Maussan — Mexican journalist / ufologist; the central promoter who presented the bodies under oath rank at time: · later: A decades-long record of debunked claims: the 1991 eclipse (Venus), the 2007 Metepec 'creature' (a skinned monkey), the 2015 Roswell slides (a Puebloan child mummy), the 2016 'demon fairy' (bat + epoxy), and the 2017 first Nazca mummies role: the figure whose pattern this episode culminates
  • Flavio Estrada — Forensic archaeologist at Peru's Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences; led the analysis rank at time: · later: Delivered the 12 Jan 2024 verdict — dolls of terrestrial bones and modern glue; 'science, not pseudo-science' role: the forensic resolution
  • Jose de Jesus Zalce Benitez — Director of the Scientific Institute for Health of the Mexican Navy; asserted at the hearing that 'these bodies have no relation to human beings' rank at time: role: the apparent military-scientific cover that lent the show legitimacy
  • Sergio Gutierrez Luna — Morena (ruling-party) lawmaker who convened the September 2023 hearing and administered the oath rank at time: role: the institutional legitimacy the event borrowed
  • Ryan Graves — Former U.S. Navy F/A-18 pilot and credible 2023 congressional UAP witness rank at time: · later: Criticized the Mexican event as 'a huge step backward... an unsubstantiated stunt', defending evidence-based UAP work role: the voice of the serious UAP field distancing itself

Object — reported

shape

two small humanoid figures with grayish, shriveled skin, elongated / conical crania, large snouts, and three fingers and three toes; thin bodies with ribcages articulated at the sides and strangely jointed limbs

size

no more than ~1 m (~3.3 ft) tall

surface features

a simulated 'skin' of paper, plant fiber, rubber and synthetic glue over assembled bones

observed behaviors

  • presented as ~1,000-year-old non-human beings, with claims of 'unknown' DNA and osmium/cadmium content and 'eggs' on X-ray
  • forensically determined to be made of bird and other animal bones, with a skull from a four-legged Earth mammal (one head described as a deteriorated llama braincase)
  • a separately seized three-fingered hand found to be hand-made 'very poorly' from human bones joined with a metal plate, cotton, and adhesive
  • the presence of modern synthetic glue ruling out any pre-Hispanic origin

Theories that invoke this case (3)

The claim the bodies were marketed under — authentic non-human beings. The corpus records that this reading has no independent scientific support and is directly contradicted by forensic analysis; it is invoked by the ETH only as the claim, not as evidence.
The reading of the episode as manufactured spectacle: a fabrication given the trappings of legislative testimony and military-scientific cover, generating global headlines before the forensic resolution — a case study in how a hoax borrows institutional legitimacy.
The cultural reading: how media incentive, a credulous hearing, and a practiced promoter convert looted archaeology into a worldwide 'alien' story — and how that spectacle damages serious inquiry.

Theories that do NOT invoke this case — and why

the physical material is fully explained as assembled terrestrial bones and modern glue — there is no anomalous material
though the bodies were marketed as ancient non-human remains, they are forensically terrestrial assemblies — no archaeological anomaly to explain
no phenomenology of any kind — a manufactured object presented as a body

Conventional explanations advanced — and their status

Deliberate fabrication — dolls assembled from looted real bones plus animal bones, bound with modern synthetic glue
proponents: Flavio Estrada / Peru's Public Prosecutor (2024) · Andrew Nelson (2018) · Guido Lombardi · the World Congress on Mummy Studies
The established forensic consensus. Corroborated across 2017-2021 analyses and the 2024 Public Prosecutor's team: genuine pre-Columbian human bones plus bird/mammal bones, disguised with paper/fiber/rubber 'skin', bound with modern glue. This is the case's settled explanation.
Authentic ~1,000-year-old non-human beings
proponents: Jaime Maussan
Rejected. Unsupported by any independent scientific body; the institutions Maussan invoked (UNAM) explicitly disavowed his conclusions, and forensic analysis directly contradicts it. The 'unknown DNA' framing reflects normal degradation/contamination — Peru's DNA testing found the material 100% human.

Where further investigation has leverage

  • Essentially settled. The remaining loose ends are investigative and legal, not scientific: the full chain of custody — who assembled which specimens, and when — across the multiple bodies promoted since 2015.
  • Complete adjudication of the Peruvian cultural-heritage and trafficking prosecutions (some convictions reported, under appeal).
  • Nothing in the peer-reviewed literature supports the non-human claim, and no credible new evidence has emerged through June 2026; scientifically the case is closed.

Corpus status

documented-hoax
A documented fabrication. Peru's Public Prosecutor's forensic team concluded the bodies are dolls assembled from genuine looted pre-Columbian human bones plus animal bones, disguised with paper-and-rubber 'skin' and bound with modern synthetic glue; the DNA was 100% human, and the institutions Maussan cited disavowed his claims. The episode's significance is not scientific but institutional: a hoax sworn before a national legislature, the culmination of a serial promoter's pattern, and a clear instance of spectacle damaging the credibility of the serious UAP field.
status history (1)
2026-06-09 · unannotated → documented-hoax — initial annotation sweep (Epic J.F4)

Suggested watching

interview · 2023 · YouTube

Jaime Maussan presents to the Mexican Congress
The September 12 2023 Mexican Congressional hearings at which Maussan presented the alleged Nazca mummies. The original presentation, in Spanish, with subtitles widely available.